2) Sobre el precio [3.50], by sinner, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/07/08 18:20:33 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

3) Es Xbox y no X-box :$ [4.00], by sharker, Rated: 5
Posted on 2003/07/08 16:08:01 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

4) ¿Buen precio? [3.33], by thuban, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/07/08 14:56:22 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

5) No me salen las cuentas [3.00], by advocatux, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/07/07 21:23:21 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

6) Artículo relacionado [3.00], by Gaylord Focker, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/07/07 19:58:03 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

7) Pasar por caja, Xbox y Hasecorp [3.00], by sinner, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/07/07 19:25:28 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

8) Indiferencia hacia XBox [3.33], by advocatux, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/07/07 17:20:46 CET
Rated on 2003/07/08 18:48:40 CET

9) Re: Interesante cuestión (from OpenCD) [4.62], by opencd, Rated: 5
Posted on 2003/04/02 02:29:38 CET
Rated on 2003/04/02 19:21:05 CET

10) Repetición de comentarios [4.28], by jdelacueva, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/10 14:09:39 CET
Rated on 2003/01/10 20:28:18 CET

11) A mi me parece bien [3.88], by mainake, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/10 10:12:25 CET
Rated on 2003/01/10 20:28:18 CET

12) ejem... buena pregunta [2.40], by gallir, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/10 03:07:53 CET
Rated on 2003/01/10 20:28:18 CET

13) Reflexión... [2.50], by rb3n, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/10 01:40:59 CET
Rated on 2003/01/10 20:28:18 CET

14) Version 0.9 de scoop [4.00], by jcantero, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/09 16:56:25 CET
Rated on 2003/01/09 20:24:49 CET

15) ¿Ideología o interés económico? [3.33], by preage, Rated: 5
Posted on 2003/01/08 01:24:06 CET
Rated on 2003/01/08 02:39:13 CET

16) Noticias que caben o no caben [4.33], by jcantero, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/07 17:42:53 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

17) Hay una diferencia pequeñita, pero... [3.28], by Envite, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/07 17:31:18 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

18) apuntes [3.50], by trukulo, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/07 17:28:36 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

19) Hombre, puesto así... [2.25], by jmerelo, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/07 17:17:57 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

20) Algunas cosas [4.70], by gonzotba, Rated: 5
Posted on 2003/01/07 15:00:40 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

21) ¿Pero cuáles temas? [3.25], by jmerelo, Rated: 2
Posted on 2003/01/07 13:17:16 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

22) Gracias. [2.83], by trukulo, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/06 19:35:22 CET
Rated on 2003/01/07 18:26:31 CET

23) dependencias de compilación [4.00], by musg0, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/04 19:09:22 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

24) ¿El error te lo da al compilar? [3.00], by jorginius, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/04 18:52:01 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

25) Es gcc, tambíen peta al compilar ruby [3.00], by ochoto, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/04 16:23:28 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

26) El filo de la navaja [3.33], by Tomby, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/04 16:07:45 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

27) No me gustó [3.00], by ragar, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/04 11:20:08 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

28) El malvado flag fomit-frame-pointer [4.00], by jorginius, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/03 19:50:07 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

29) omit-frame-pointer y optimize-sibling-calls [3.33], by ochoto, Rated: 4
Posted on 2003/01/03 18:02:23 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET

30) ¿Qué opciones del gcc3.2 son las que no van? [3.00], by jorginius, Rated: 3
Posted on 2003/01/03 17:33:41 CET
Rated on 2003/01/04 23:35:08 CET